Thursday, February 11, 2010

Ode to Oakland - Part 2

Wow. My “Ode to Oakland” post really resonated with a lot of you. I can’t say I’m surprised. Actually, it’s really sad that so many of you feel my pain – that Oakland has done this to so many of us. I don’t how you all stumbled onto my post, but I really appreciate everyone’s stories and support. Your stories resonated with me too. There were some great points made in the comments, and I’d like to respond to and expand upon some of them.

“I've never been treated so poorly by an organization and a City department in my whole life.”

This from Matt, who wanted access to the driveway of a city funded retirement so he could paint the side of his house. Come on Oakland, this is that habit of sabotaging anything good that happens to you I’m talking about. Someone wants to make improvements on his house, which improves the city. What’s your problem Oakland?

"Have seen so many young couples leave Oakland and move on to towns that 'didn't eat their own.'"

Len, you hit the nail on the head there. Your comment almost made me cry. Yes, I do feel like Oakland has tried to eat me alive and drive me out, yet I was its most ardent supporter and defender. Fool me once, Oakland, shame on me. Fool me twice, I’m outta here.

“Younger folks than us will have to pick up the ball, we wish them all the best.”

Anonymous, your note was so sweet you did make me cry. Sounds like you guys landed in a great town and I hope we will too. And I totally understand what you mean about feeling jumpy – Oakland has made me that way too. Before my husband was robbed at gunpoint (see the $40 Potato), my neighbor across the street was car jacked in front of her own house. She had gone out to the car for something and a group of kids with guns demanded her keys and took off in her car. Ever since then, I haven’t been able to leave my front door without looking both ways, just to make sure it’s safe. It’s really no way to live. Even though I’m only in my late 20s, I swear I’m too old for this crap. I hear you sister: Folks younger than me will have to pick up the ball.

“… a big city, and especially corrupt, rotten, overpaid city of Oakland with its gang and drug generational thug families, is NOT a place I will stay permanently.”

I know it’s not politically correct to talk about generational thug families because it implies we’re talking about a specific racial group, but really, here in the city of Oakland thugs come in all colors and sizes so it’s not like we’re picking on one group or another. With that said, Brell, I’ve never heard it put quite like this, but your idea of Generational Thug Families holding the city hostage seems to fit. Case in point: the Bey family. It’s amazing to think how deeply in bed they were (and still are) with the city and OPD. Yusuf Bey IV has been recorded on tape talking about how the City Council was afraid of him and that an OPD detective was basically in his back pocket. What? All this, and BART almost gave $1.1 million in city contracts to a member of the Bey family. Seriously?

“Oakland doesn't care about its Middle Class, only about City Workers & wealth transfer. It believes there are only rich & poor, nothing in between, and acts accordingly (witness tapping property taxes for everything).”

So true! I was FLOORED when I found out that homeowners in the City of Alameda actually pay less taxes than we do here in Oakland, because they don’t have a million assessments on top of the county percentage. Yet the schools are good in Alameda. The cops come when you call. The streets aren’t full of potholes. It’s a very stupid policy to dump on your middle class, because we are the backbone of any community. The rich in Oakland can give a damn about its public schools because their kids go to Head Royce. They can give a damn about cops and crime because they lock themselves up in the hills behind iron gates and security systems. They can give a damn about potholes because their cars have great suspension, unlike the buckets some of us drive.

“Soon as we can, we're going to move on… all of us are considering moving after going through the latest crime wave, and with the politicians all but ignoring us.”

I can’t blame you for wanting to leave. Do you live in the Laurel? I’m in Allendale, right below the Laurel. This latest crime wave in Oakland was also our final shove out the door. I was walking my dog past my neighbor’s house recently and saw him putting bars on his windows. So sad…. especially since because the previous owner taken down the bars a few years ago to much applause from everyone in the neighborhood. But my new neighbor was broken into and the robbers came through a window, and he saw no other option but to put up bars. Sucks. We told him to put up a gate and get a dog, but he wasn't interested.

So in my one-block radius within the past 2.5 months, a woman was carjacked in front of her house, my husband was robbed at gunpoint around the corner from our house, and my neighbor’s home was broken into. And that’s just the people we know! It’s not like I’m a social butterfly around here (see my previous note about looking both ways before walking out my own front door). Yet the City Council’s big thing right now is building a new stadium for the As in Jack London Square. Priorities?

“If Oakland is to become better, we must stay to help make it work.”

I hear you, Steve from Glenview. And if I lived in the Glenview, I might be able to hang on a little longer, but I live in the Allendale, and I can’t take anymore. Like a previous commenter said, younger folks than me will have to pick up the ball, and I wish them all the best. I truly do. In fact, I’ll rent them my house for a song.

“Remember the good times to your new friends in the ‘sticks’.”

Amen! I will try my best.

9 comments:

  1. Jenny, I do want to point out a couple "corrections" or maybe different POV:
    --Yusef Bey IV was a generational thug (adopted into) but he was not supported by OPD, but by one detective. There's a difference, and the sins of one cop should not be painted across all Officers of OPD (no more than any generalization should be made). Especially as it's a big force and there are a lot of caring officers in OPD.

    --The Bey's support in the City Counsel its no longer the case, and many of the CC members have changed. However at the time they got their City loans it was the case. Now there are a lot more honorably minority business people the City can award contracts to, but at the time the Bey's were able to shame the CC & use the color of the skin as a subsidy.

    The CC's actions at the time, BTW, were a part of the rich vs. poor simplifications.

    --There are actually quite a few good Elementary schools in Oakland, many quite diverse (witness Peralta, Glenview, Cleveland, Kaiser, etc., etc.). There might be as many or more bad, but that doesn't mean the stereotype should go unchallenged. There's a lot of progress being made by many schools here.

    I made the comment earlier about Oakland not caring about it's Middle Class. I stand by that, and I will continue to try and point this out loud in my neighborhood and to the Politicians, to improve things. The middle class in Oakland is quite diverse, and the battle will be won by supporting them in "transitional" neighborhoods like Allendale, and the outskirts of Millsmont, Maxwell Park, etc. (all near you), and others.

    Oakland needs policies to make these neighborhoods safer, and economic policies to bring jobs to the "missing middle" (lower middle & working classes) that help give them solid incomes and elevate themselves to the Middle Class.

    City Councilpeople should all have ideas about how to make this happen. If they don't, throw them out and elect somebody new. Or run yourself...

    ReplyDelete
  2. BTW, your comments got found because it was linked on the A Better Oakland blog, then commented on there, then blown out to some neighborhood listserves from there...

    Just thought you'd like to know :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. So Jenny...you and Eliot each represent 1,000 in Oakland, including yourselves? Is that to say that you are each telling/persuading/urging 999 other people to leave Oakland as well and they are following suite? I am having difficulty understanding any other reason--besides as a joke--that you would indicate that on the sign.

    ReplyDelete
  4. the graphic was a total joke and the inaccuracy was due to laziness... changing the 9 to a 7 was easier than changing the 300 to 298. but you're probably right - accuracy is more important. the graphic has been duly updated!

    livegreen, thanks for your comments. you're right, it's probably not right to skewer an entire police department for the actions of that one detective, especially in these hopeful early days of Chief Batts. That man's got his work cut out for him and I am rooting for him all the way. He's been shopping around a curfew but has been told Oakland is "too progressive for that." What good is a progressive city if you can't walk out your door without looking both ways?

    I probably shouldn't skewer the entire city council for the sins of their past, but I am so fed up with the current council. I live in Quan's district, and she is on my neighborhood listserves. I know because she's always griping about how the listserve won't allow her to post her newsletter. Boohoo. But seriously, I can't understand why she is focusing her energy on useless things like a stadium for the Oakland As when it seems like every day her constituents are posting harrowing tales of being robbed at gun point, being followed home, and having their house broken into. Just last week on the Laurel listserve someone's neighbor was held at gun point in front of his house and he ended up running away and hiding behind cars until his attackers gave up looking for him (not recommended by OPD) because he was afraid if they muggers got into his house they would hurt his sleeping wife and children. Heart wrenching! This is happening in Quan's district, yet she told Oakland North that she wouldn't support the curfew shopped around by Chief Batts because "I don’t want something that is too broad. The most important thing is to save [Oakland teenagers'] lives.

    What about saving the lives of Oakland citizens who are being held hostage by Oakland teenagers? I say make them stay home at night - it's not that bad.

    BTW the story I'm quoting from was published by Oakland North back in January - http://oaklandnorth.net/2010/01/09/opd-chief-batts-ready-to-try-curfew-and-new-technology-but-is-oakland/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Crime was never one of Jean's big things. + a curfew would actually help save lives, including teenagers. And since most victims in the City (certainly not all) are African American, it would disproportionately help save young AfAm lives.

    Most kids and families are good, no matter where they live. Helping tilt the balance & emphasizing positive peer pressure will any kids who are on the fence towards positive instead of negative decisions.

    & this idea of a curfew is being supported by two of Oakland's most important African American leaders. It's not racist in the least, unless Bay Area liberals are going to start calling these responsible AfAm leaders racist.

    Better to not risk anything and ignore solutions, than risk offending parents who let their kids stay out on the street into the middle of the night, and who might in defense of themselves then name-call any critique as racist.

    The shame of it is Jean has some very good ideas on education. But she needs to balance this out with real solutions and not being so worried about offending people who might be (on some issues) in the wrong...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why are you calling a (new) stadium for the A's "useless"? Granted, we don't know what Major League baseball will decide, while Wolff and Fischer don't give a rat's a** about Oakland. However, if there is enough opposition at the SJ/Fremont sites, than the stadium (a waterfront one at that), is far from useless, for Oakland. I understand that Quan needs to prioritize crime over many things. She can still help push for the stadium at the same time. Every City Council member, and/or so-called "leader" of Oakland should be pushing for that...not Dellums alone.
    BTW--thank you for fixing the sign.

    ReplyDelete
  7. LG, I have to agree w Jenny on the Bey/Opd situation. It wasn't a case of "one bad apple".

    I don't know the extent of the undue influence, but in a police dept as small as OPD, Sgt Longmire's connection to the Bey clan would have been well known by his commanders. Only to be expected from ambitious police brass when endorsements of Bey came from powerful local politicians such as Barbara Lee.

    -len raphael
    temescal

    ReplyDelete
  8. Len, I don't know who at OPD did and didn't know the Beys. However I don't think one can assume all the Brass did, and that this was some sort of conspiracy. Besides OPD Officers are moved around quite a bit to gain experience in different areas, and they often give their juniors (esp. a Sgt.) some leeway if they're told it's beneficial.

    I don't agree with how OPD handled Longmire (he should have been fired) but that doesn't mean guilt by association.

    As an example of experience in different areas, do you know what happened to Longmire's boss? Ersie Joyner was promoted to Captain. Oh no! Conspiracy! go the assumptions. Well you know why?

    My understanding is because he was instrumental in finding Lovelle Mixon.

    Not all issues are cut-and-dry. There are many good officers at OPD who knew Longmire but didn't know the Beys...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I understand the desire of As fans to keep the team in Oakland, but honestly I just think we have bigger fish to fry right now. What good is a fancy new waterfront stadium when most people residing outside of Oakland would be afraid to step foot into our city? What suburban grandpa is going to want to bring his little grandson to watch a baseball game in a city ranked the 3rd most crime ridden city in the US in 2009?

    Oakland needs to get a grip on crime first before tackling anything else.

    There's much to be said about OPD but I guess we should look forward and focus on the positive for now. I'm really excited about Chief Batts and I'm hopeful he can make a difference. His strategic plan for Oakland is certainly ambitious and agressive, but when you've got a problem as big as Oakland's, you've got to think big to solve it.

    His plan is based on the 3 things he's heard over and over from Oakland community members:

    • Parents want their children to be able to play outside without fearing they will be hurt or killed.
    • Members of the business community would like to open and operate their businesses without fear of being harassed or robbed.
    • Many people have expressed a desire for police to be there when they need them, and to treat them with respect and dignity.

    Wow, someone within OPD finally recognize these basic issues. Oh happy day.

    Here's a link to the BETA OPD site.
    http://www2.oaklandnet.com/Government/o/OPD/index.htm

    ReplyDelete